{"id":3505713,"date":"2024-12-02T14:14:16","date_gmt":"2024-12-02T14:14:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/?p=3505713"},"modified":"2024-12-09T10:27:52","modified_gmt":"2024-12-09T10:27:52","slug":"chinas-emissions-have-now-caused-more-global-warming-than-eu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/stories\/2024-12-02\/chinas-emissions-have-now-caused-more-global-warming-than-eu\/","title":{"rendered":"China\u2019s emissions have now caused more global warming than EU"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>China\u2019s historical emissions within its borders have now caused more global warming than the 27 member states of the EU combined, according to new Carbon Brief analysis.<\/p>\n<p>The findings come amid fraught negotiations at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, where negotiators have been invoking the \u201cprinciple of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">historical responsibility<\/a>\u201d in their discussions over who should pay money towards a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/cop29-what-is-the-new-collective-quantified-goal-on-climate-finance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">new goal<\/a>\u00a0for climate finance\u00a0\u2013\u00a0and how much.<\/p>\n<p>Carbon Brief\u2019s analysis shows that 94% of the global\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/guest-post-what-the-tiny-remaining-1-5c-carbon-budget-means-for-climate-policy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">carbon budget<\/a>\u00a0for 1.5C has now been used up, as cumulative emissions since 1850 have reached 2,607bn tonnes of carbon dioxide (GtCO2).<\/p>\n<p>While developed countries have used the majority of this budget, the analysis shows that China\u2019s historical emissions reached 312GtCO2 in 2023, overtaking the EU\u2019s 303GtCO2.<\/p>\n<p>China is still far behind the 532GtCO2 emitted by the US, however, according to the analysis.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, China is unlikely to ever overtake the US contribution to global warming, based on current policies, committed plans and technology trends in both countries. This is\u00a0even before accounting for the potential\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-trump-election-win-could-add-4bn-tonnes-to-us-emissions-by-2030\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">emissions-boosting<\/a>\u00a0policies of the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/experts-what-does-a-trump-presidency-mean-for-climate-action\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">incoming<\/a>\u00a0Trump presidency.<\/p>\n<p>In addition, China\u2019s 1.4 billion people are each responsible for 227tCO2, a third of the 682tCO2 linked to the EU\u2019s 450 million citizens \u2013\u00a0and far below the 1,570tCO2 per capita in the US.<\/p>\n<p>The new analysis follows Carbon Brief\u2019s 2021 analysis of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">historical responsibility<\/a>, based on emissions taking place within each country\u2019s present-day borders or considering emissions embedded in imports. Further analysis in 2023 assigned responsibility to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/revealed-how-colonial-rule-radically-shifts-historical-responsibility-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">colonial rulers<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>(A table at the end of this article shows which countries have the largest historical emissions according to the full range of metrics, including emissions per person.)<\/p>\n<p><center><iframe class=\"chart-animation\" src=\"https:\/\/customer-pdmarvofavyxkb3r.cloudflarestream.com\/b4e476e770020df697d8704650c9a92f\/iframe?poster=https%3A%2F%2Fcustomer-pdmarvofavyxkb3r.cloudflarestream.com%2Fb4e476e770020df697d8704650c9a92f%2Fthumbnails%2Fthumbnail.jpg%3Ftime%3D5s%26height%3D600\" allowfullscreen=\"allowfullscreen\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><span data-mce-type=\"bookmark\" style=\"display: inline-block; width: 0px; overflow: hidden; line-height: 0;\" class=\"mce_SELRES_start\">\ufeff<\/span><\/iframe><\/center><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>Animated chart shows the cumulative historical emissions of key countries since 1850. Credit: Joe Goodman \/ Carbon Brief<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">History matters<\/h3>\n<p>Historical CO2 emissions matter for climate change, because there is a finite \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/guest-post-what-the-tiny-remaining-1-5c-carbon-budget-means-for-climate-policy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">carbon budget<\/a>\u201d that can be released into the atmosphere before a given level of global warming is breached.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in order to limit warming to 1.5C above pre-industrial levels, only around 2,800GtCO2 can be added to the atmosphere, counting all emissions since the pre-industrial period. (This is according to a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41558-023-01848-5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2023 study<\/a>\u00a0updating figures from the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.ipcc.ch\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change<\/a>.)<\/p>\n<p>Cumulative emissions since 1850 will reach 2,607CO2 by the end of 2024, according to Carbon Brief\u2019s new analysis, meaning that some 94% of the 1.5C budget will have been used up.<\/p>\n<p>These cumulative historical emissions are\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">directly and proportionally<\/a>\u00a0linked to the amount of global warming that has\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/state-of-the-climate-2024-will-be-first-year-above-1-5c-of-global-warming\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">already been seen<\/a>\u00a0to date.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/unfccc.int\/sites\/default\/files\/resource\/sbsta2024_L17_adv.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Conclusions<\/a>\u00a0adopted by countries at the end of the first week at COP29 also make this link, in light of 2024 being on track to be the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/state-of-the-climate-2024-will-be-first-year-above-1-5c-of-global-warming\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">hottest year<\/a>\u00a0on record:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>\u201cThe [subsidiary body to the UN climate process] SBSTA\u2026expressed utmost concern about the state of the global climate system\u2026with 2024 being on track to be the hottest year on record, which is primarily a result of the long-term warming caused by emissions from pre-industrial times until now.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>In addition,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/file\/d\/1qGhCnynMCdaIYAEaV-EDE7XVv_K5nbhO\/view?usp=sharing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">draft text<\/a>\u00a0on the new climate finance goal explicitly links responsibility for global warming to finance \u201cburden-sharing arrangements\u201d \u2013 meaning who should pay and how much.<\/p>\n<p>In one passage of a draft published on 16 November 2024, there is a reference to the \u201cprinciple of historical responsibility\u201d. Another passage says that developed-country cumulative emissions should be used as a \u201cproxy for historic responsibility for climate change\u201d. The draft states:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\"><p>\u201c[D]eveloped country parties shall establish burden-sharing arrangements to enable the delivery of the [new climate finance] goal based on cumulative territorial CO2 emissions\u2026as a proxy for historic responsibility for climate change.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>An alternative option in the draft says that countries should have to contribute to the new climate finance target if they are one of the world\u2019s \u201ctop 10 emitters\u201d based on cumulative emissions\u00a0\u2013 and if they have average per-capita incomes above a certain level.<\/p>\n<p>(If agreed, this would mean China, as a top-10 historical emitter, being obliged to contribute to climate finance. However, the draft is not final and is likely to change significantly. Many parts of the draft are enclosed in square brackets, indicating that they are not agreed.)<\/p>\n<p>At the annual UN climate talks, it is also common for developing countries to remind developed nations that they have used up a large share of the world\u2019s carbon budget \u2013 and that they should, therefore, be making stronger efforts to cut their emissions.<\/p>\n<p>For example, in the closing plenary of the first week at COP29, Saudi Arabia \u201clamented depleted carbon budgets\u2026in light of historic cumulative emissions as well as developed countries\u2019 insufficient mitigation efforts\u201d,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/enb.iisd.org\/baku-un-climate-change-conference-cop29-daily-report-16nov2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">according<\/a>\u00a0to the\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/enb.iisd.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Earth Negotiations Bulletin<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">China\u2019s rising contribution<\/h3>\n<p>It is true that developed countries have been the leading contributors to\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">historical emissions<\/a>. This is despite the fact that China now has the world\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-global-co2-emissions-will-reach-new-high-in-2024-despite-slower-growth\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">highest emissions<\/a>\u00a0on an annual basis.<\/p>\n<p>Put another way, developed countries have made a\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/revealed-how-colonial-rule-radically-shifts-historical-responsibility-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">disproportionately large<\/a>\u00a0contribution to current global warming, particularly when considering the number of people that live in them.<\/p>\n<p>This is a key reason why the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/interactive-the-paris-agreement-on-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Paris Agreement<\/a>\u00a0says they \u201cshould continue taking the lead\u201d on cutting their emissions \u2013\u00a0and why they must provide\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/cop29-what-is-the-new-collective-quantified-goal-on-climate-finance\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">climate finance<\/a>\u00a0for developing nations.<\/p>\n<p>The\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/unfccc.int\/files\/essential_background\/background_publications_htmlpdf\/application\/pdf\/conveng.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">1992 UN climate convention<\/a>\u00a0(UNFCCC) listed \u201cdeveloped\u201d countries in Annex I, based on membership of the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.oecd.org\/en.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development<\/a>\u00a0at the time.<\/p>\n<p>The convention says that the \u201clargest share of historical and current global emissions of greenhouse gases has originated in developed countries\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, at the time of the convention being agreed in 1992, Annex I countries accounted for 22% of the world\u2019s population and a disproportionately large 61% of historical emissions.<\/p>\n<p>By the end of 2024, however, Annex I countries\u2019 share of cumulative historical emissions will have fallen to 52% of the global total. Carbon Brief\u2019s analysis suggests that developing countries \u2013\u00a0those outside Annex I\u00a0\u2013 will account for a majority of historical emissions in roughly six years.<\/p>\n<p>China\u2019s rapidly rising contribution to cumulative emissions is a major driver of this shift.<\/p>\n<p>In 1992, China\u2019s historical emissions were around two-fifths (41%) the size of the EU\u2019s. By 2015, when the Paris Agreement was finalised, they were still only four-fifths (80%) of the EU\u2019s total.<\/p>\n<p>By the end of 2023, Carbon Brief\u2019s analysis shows that China\u2019s cumulative emissions (red line in the figure below) had overtaken those from the 27 EU member states (yellow).<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-54905 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/China_s_contribution_to_global_warming_has_just_overtaken_the_EU.webp\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>EU27 and Chinese cumulative historical CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, cement, land use, land use change and forestry, 1850-2024, billion tonnes. Source: Carbon Brief analysis of figures from\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41597-023-02041-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Jones et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023),\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41558-023-01848-5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Lamboll et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023),\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalcarbonproject.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the Global Carbon Project<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CDIAC<\/a>,\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/owid\/co2-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Our World in Data<\/a>, the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iea.org\/data-and-statistics\/charts\/co2-emissions-from-international-shipping-in-the-net-zero-scenario-2000-2030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">International Energy Agency<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/carbonmonitor.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Carbon Monitor<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Still, it is worth emphasising that China\u2019s emissions remain far behind those of the EU on a per-capita basis.<\/p>\n<p>When weighting historical emissions per head of population in 2024, China\u2019s contribution is just 227tCO2 per capita, less than a third of the 682tCO2 for people in the EU27.<\/p>\n<p>(There are several other ways to measure historical contributions. These include adjustments to account for CO2\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/revealed-how-colonial-rule-radically-shifts-historical-responsibility-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">embedded<\/a>\u00a0in imported goods and services, or shifting responsibility under periods of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/revealed-how-colonial-rule-radically-shifts-historical-responsibility-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">colonial rule<\/a>. See the table below to compare countries using different metrics.)<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">US still most responsible<\/h3>\n<p>While China is now the world\u2019s second-largest contributor to historical emissions, ahead of the EU27, it remains far behind the US, as shown in the figure below.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-54907 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/The_US_is_still_the_biggest_contributor_to_global_warming_%E2%80%93_by_far.webp\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>US, EU27 and Chinese cumulative historical CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, cement, land use, land use change and forestry, 1850-2024, billion tonnes. Source: Source: Carbon Brief analysis of figures from<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41597-023-02041-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Jones et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023),<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41558-023-01848-5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Lamboll et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023), the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalcarbonproject.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Global Carbon Project<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0CDIAC<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/owid\/co2-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Our World in Data<\/a>, the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iea.org\/data-and-statistics\/charts\/co2-emissions-from-international-shipping-in-the-net-zero-scenario-2000-2030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0International Energy Agency<\/a>\u00a0and<a href=\"https:\/\/carbonmonitor.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Carbon Monitor<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>With cumulative emissions of 537GtCO2 by the end of 2024, the US total is two-thirds higher than China\u2019s and three-quarters above the EU27.<\/p>\n<p>Still, China is closing the gap, given its annual emissions are now roughly double those of the US. This is clear from the slope of the curves in the chart above, where China\u2019s line is rising steeply.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">China may never overtake the US<\/h3>\n<p>The fact that China\u2019s\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-global-co2-emissions-will-reach-new-high-in-2024-despite-slower-growth\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">annual emissions<\/a>\u00a0are so much higher than those from the US begs the question of when might it overtake the US, in terms of its cumulative historical total.<\/p>\n<p>A 2023 article in the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/climate-environment\/interactive\/2023\/global-warming-carbon-emissions-china-us\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Washington Post<\/a>\u00a0attempted to answer this question, asserting that China would overtake the US in 2050. However, it used implausible projections in which annual emissions from the US, China and Europe remained almost unchanged for decades.<\/p>\n<p>To attempt a more plausible answer, Carbon Brief has used data from the latest\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iea.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">International Energy Agency<\/a>\u00a0(IEA)\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-solar-surge-will-send-coal-power-tumbling-by-2030-iea-data-reveals\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">World Energy Outlook<\/a>, published in October 2024.<\/p>\n<p>Specifically, Carbon Brief looked at how annual emissions in China, the US and EU27 might change under \u201ccurrent policy settings\u201d in the IEA\u2019s \u201cstated policies scenario\u201d (STEPS). This reflects governments\u2019 current and committed plans, as well as the latest energy-price trends.<\/p>\n<p>The dashed lines in the figure below illustrate how the annual emissions of the US, EU and China are each expected to fall steeply under those current policy settings.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-54909 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/National_emissions_are_set_to_decline_over_the_coming_decades_2.webp\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>US, EU27 and Chinese annual CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, cement, land use, land use change and forestry, 1850-2100, billion tonnes. Source: Carbon Brief analysis of figures from<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41597-023-02041-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Jones et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023),<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41558-023-01848-5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Lamboll et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023), the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalcarbonproject.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Global Carbon Project<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0CDIAC<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/owid\/co2-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Our World in Data<\/a>, the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iea.org\/data-and-statistics\/charts\/co2-emissions-from-international-shipping-in-the-net-zero-scenario-2000-2030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0International Energy Agency,<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/carbonmonitor.org\/\">\u00a0Carbon Monitor\u00a0<\/a>and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/origin.iea.org\/reports\/world-energy-outlook-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">IEA World Energy Outlook 2024.<\/a>\u00a0The IEA outlook ends in 2050. Emissions beyond 2050 are based on a continuation of the trend since 2040.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Adding these annual emissions outlooks to the historical totals up to this year suggests that China may never overtake the US in terms of its cumulative emissions, as shown in the figure below.<\/p>\n<p>Emissions outlooks are by their nature uncertain. For example, China\u2019s emissions might fail to fall as fast as the IEA expects\u00a0\u2013 or the US might go faster than expected.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, the impact of the incoming Trump presidency rolling back climate rules and aiming to \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/drill-baby-drill-the-surprising-history-of-donald-trumps-fossil-fuel-slogan\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">drill baby, drill<\/a>\u201d would make it even less likely that China would ever overtake the US.<\/p>\n<p><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-54910 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/China_may_never_overtake_the_US_contribution_to_warming_5.webp\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>US, EU27 and Chinese cumulative historical CO2 emissions from fossil fuels, cement, land use, land use change and forestry, 1850-2100, billion tonnes. Source: Carbon Brief analysis of figures from<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41597-023-02041-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Jones et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023),<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41558-023-01848-5\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Lamboll et al<\/a>\u00a0(2023), the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.globalcarbonproject.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Global Carbon Project<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/cdiac.ess-dive.lbl.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0CDIAC<\/a>,<a href=\"https:\/\/github.com\/owid\/co2-data\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Our World in Data<\/a>, the<a href=\"https:\/\/www.iea.org\/data-and-statistics\/charts\/co2-emissions-from-international-shipping-in-the-net-zero-scenario-2000-2030\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0International Energy Agency,<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/carbonmonitor.org\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">\u00a0Carbon Monitor\u00a0<\/a>and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/origin.iea.org\/reports\/world-energy-outlook-2024\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">IEA World Energy Outlook 2024.<\/a>\u00a0The IEA outlook ends in 2050. Annual emissions beyond 2050 are based on a continuation of the trend since 2040.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Whether or not China overtakes the US in terms of its historical emissions, it is unlikely to escape\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/china-briefing-14-november-2024-cop29-special-edition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">pressure<\/a>\u00a0to contribute to global flows of climate finance.<\/p>\n<p>At COP29, Ding Xuexiang, Chinese president Xi Jinping\u2019s \u201cspecial representative\u201d and the nation\u2019s executive vice-premier, notably used the UN language of climate finance to describe Chinese overseas aid for the\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/china-briefing-14-november-2024-cop29-special-edition\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">first time<\/a>. However, China has\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.spglobal.com\/commodityinsights\/en\/market-insights\/latest-news\/energy-transition\/111524-cop29-china-will-only-make-voluntary-climate-finance-contributions-official\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">insisted<\/a>\u00a0that it will only provide such finance voluntarily.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">About the data<\/h3>\n<p>This analysis is based on historical CO2 emissions from fossil fuel use, cement production, land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF), during the period 1850-2024.<\/p>\n<p>The approach mirrors the methodology used for Carbon Brief\u2019s analysis of\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">historical responsibility<\/a>\u00a0according to emissions within national borders, and when considering\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/revealed-how-colonial-rule-radically-shifts-historical-responsibility-for-climate-change\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">colonial rule<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Those articles explain\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/#fossil\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">how it is possible<\/a>\u00a0to confidently estimate emissions that took place more than 100 years ago, how the analysis deals with changes in\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/#changing\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">national borders<\/a>, how emissions from\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/analysis-which-countries-are-historically-responsible-for-climate-change\/#landuse\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">land use<\/a>\u00a0can be estimated and why the analysis only\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.carbonbrief.org\/revealed-how-colonial-rule-radically-shifts-historical-responsibility-for-climate-change\/#8\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">starts in 1850<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>As those articles illustrated, there are many different lenses through which historical responsibility for climate change can be viewed, each offering an alternative viewpoint on the world.<\/p>\n<p>The table below, which is sortable and searchable, shows a selection of the different ways that historical responsibility can be carved up.<\/p>\n<p>It lists countries according to population, historical emissions within their own borders, emissions after accounting for colonial responsibility and the impact of CO2 embedded in trade since 1990.<\/p>\n<p>The table also shows two alternative per capita metrics. The first shows cumulative territorial emissions for each country, divided by its population in 2024. The second shows per-capita territorial emissions in each year, cumulatively added up through to the present day.<\/p>\n<p><center><iframe id=\"datawrapper-chart-rm42k\" title=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/datawrapper.dwcdn.net\/rm42k\/2\/\" height=\"901\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" aria-label=\"Table\" data-external=\"1\" data-mce-fragment=\"1\"><\/iframe><\/center><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><em>(Note that the table excludes countries with a population of less than 1 million people.)<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>This data is free to use under the terms of Carbon Brief\u2019s\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"http:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by-nc-nd\/4.0\/legalcode\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>CC licence<\/em><\/a><em>. The licence applies to non-commercial use and requires a credit to \u201cCarbon Brief\u201d and a link to this article.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>China\u2019s historical emissions within its borders have now caused more global warming than the 27 member states of the EU combined, according to new Carbon Brief analysis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":128238,"featured_media":3505728,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[79716,213529,79718],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3505713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy","category-energy-featured","category-environment"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3505713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/128238"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3505713"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3505713\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3506046,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3505713\/revisions\/3506046"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3505728"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3505713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3505713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3505713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}