{"id":3470517,"date":"2018-02-14T10:43:47","date_gmt":"2018-02-14T10:43:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.resilience.org\/?p=3470517"},"modified":"2018-02-14T10:43:48","modified_gmt":"2018-02-14T10:43:48","slug":"we-have-what-it-takes-to-meet-the-crisis-of-our-democracy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/stories\/2018-02-14\/we-have-what-it-takes-to-meet-the-crisis-of-our-democracy\/","title":{"rendered":"We Have what it Takes to Meet the Crisis of our Democracy"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 1999, Dee Hock, founder of Visa,\u00a0quipped<\/a>, \u201cIt\u2019s far too late and things are far too bad for pessimism.\u201d But 18 years later, pessimism can feel like the new realism.<\/p>\n

After all, just\u00a0three Americans<\/a>\u00a0control more wealth than the bottom half of us. In last year\u2019s election, less than 1 percent of Americans provided most of the\u00a0$6.4 billion in campaign spending<\/a>, worsening an imbalance in political influence that\u2019s long been with us. Even in the 1980s and 90s average Americans, according to a data-deep\u00a0study<\/a>, exerted \u201cnear zero<\/a>\u201d influence in Washington.<\/p>\n

In fending off despair and effectively taking on democracy\u2019s degradation, one insight has helped us a lot: that it\u2019s not the magnitude of a challenge that crushes the human spirit; rather, it\u2019s a sense of futility that does us in.\u00a0Homo sapiens<\/em>\u00a0evolved, after all, as doers and problem solvers.<\/p>\n

Yet, to seize a challenge \u2014 and certainly one as mammoth as building a strong, inclusive democracy \u2014 our species seems to require three ingredients. First, we must believe that meeting the challenge is essential; second, that it\u2019s possible; and third, that there\u2019s a meaningful place for us in the action.<\/p>\n

With all three, humans have proven to be unstoppable.<\/p>\n

Essential<\/strong><\/p>\n

History shows us that democracy is not simply a \u201cgood\u201d thing. It is the only approach to governance that can bring forth the best in us while keeping the worst in check. To make our case, consider three anti-democratic conditions shown time and again to bring out the worst.<\/p>\n

One is concentrated power. From Nazi Germany to Stalinist Russia to Mao\u2019s China, \u201cgood\u201d people commit unspeakable acts. And concentrated power measured by economic inequality \u2014 typically translating into political power \u2014 saps the life out of a society.\u00a0Social epidemiologists<\/a>\u00a0in the United Kingdom found that economic inequality strongly correlates with a vast range of social and physical ills, from homicide to mental illness.<\/p>\n

Also eliciting the worst in us is secrecy. Before the 2008 financial collapse, bankers were feverishly pushing risky financial \u201cproducts,\u201d and among their creators a favorite slogan was I.B.G. Y.B.G.: \u201cI\u2019ll be gone, you\u2019ll be gone.\u201d Its meaning? The traders knew they would be long gone from their posts by the time their schemes went south. When we humans believe no one\u2019s watching, we\u2019re vastly more likely to cheat. And only accountable democracy can ensure transparency.<\/p>\n

A third anti-democratic condition bringing out humanity\u2019s worst is a \u201cculture of blame.\u201d When people jump to finger-pointing before exploring shared responsibility, ongoing conflict is certain; and time spent pointing fingers is time lost from actually solving a problem. Humanity\u2019s tendency to prefer those like us and distance ourselves from those perceived as \u201cthe other\u201d also brings real harm, including the limiting of others\u2019 democratic rights. Less appreciated is how othering diminishes all of our lives as the gifts of those excluded are denied their full flourishing; whereas diversity, social science confirms, enhances creativity, innovation, and our overall capacity to solve problems.<\/p>\n

But humanity doesn\u2019t have to stay locked in this three-pronged trap.<\/p>\n

Democracy embodies their opposites. It is the only form of governance enabling us to create and protect the positive conditions shown to elicit the best: the dispersion of power, transparency, and acceptance of mutual accountability \u2014 not the blame game. These conditions also make possible meeting human requirements for thriving beyond the physical: our need for connection, meaning, and a sense of agency.<\/p>\n

Possible<\/strong><\/p>\n

Once we believe something is essential, we don\u2019t need to know that its realization is certain or even that our odds are great in order to jump into action. We need only believe it\u2019s possible.<\/p>\n

To believe that democracy is \u201cpossible\u201d we need some level of confidence that humans come equipped for it and that history offers proof of success, however imperfectly, of at least its key elements.<\/p>\n

Evidence that we humans come equipped is strong. Democracy requires a deep sensitivity to fairness, along with capacities for empathy and cooperation. Fortunately, a growing body of science shows that all three are human qualities. Research shows that even toddlers rush to help others without prompt or reward; and fMRI scans recording the brain activity of subjects competing and cooperating find that cooperation stimulates our reward-processing center in ways comparable to eating chocolate!<\/p>\n

On our innate sense of fairness, even the supposed godfather of greed, Adam Smith,\u00a0wrote<\/a>\u00a0well over two centuries ago that humans feel \u201cin a peculiar manner tied, bound and obliged to the observation of justice.\u201d Even capuchin monkeys demonstrate measurable sensitivity to fairness. In one famous\u00a0experiment<\/a>, they rebelled against what they perceived as caretakers\u2019 unfair treatment.<\/p>\n

And what about proof that those capacities can generate progress through elected government that\u2019s accountable and inclusive?<\/p>\n

From 1933 to 1938, our federal government created fairness rules \u2014 including Social Security, the right of workers to organize, and a legal minimum wage, dramatically narrowing the gap between most of us and a tiny minority at the top. Broad-based economic\u00a0prosperity followed<\/a>. From 1947 to 1973, median U.S. family income doubled. In striking contrast to recent decades, every economic class gained during this period, with the poorest advancing the most.<\/p>\n

Outside the United States, George Lakey in \u201cViking Economics<\/a>\u201d notes that some Nordic countries were among Europe\u2019s most unequal a century ago, but citizen \u201cmovements . . . challenged a thousand years of poverty and oppression, took the offensive and built democracy.\u201d Today, most Nordic democracies boast voter turnout of 77 percent or more, compared to about 56 percent in the United States. Often Americans dismiss Scandinavia\u2019s social advances because they believe such gains come at the expense of economic dynamism. Yet, in the 2016\u00a0Global Innovation Index<\/a>, Sweden ranked second while the United States ranked fourth. Three Scandinavian countries made the top 10.<\/p>\n

While we celebrate evidence of the possibility of democracy answering to citizens, we also stand with our first African American federal appellate judge, William Hastie, who\u00a0described<\/a>\u00a0democracy as \u201cbecoming, rather than being. It can easily be lost, but never is fully won. Its essence is eternal struggle.\u201d<\/p>\n

A place for us<\/strong><\/p>\n

Finally, to take on a colossal challenge, we humans must see a meaningful place for ourselves in the action \u2014 exactly what is increasingly available within an emerging\u00a0Democracy Movement<\/a>. It is a grassroots \u201cmovement of movements\u201d enabling Americans committed to the broadest array of issues to also work on the root crisis \u2014 democracy itself, the mother of all issues. And, in just the past few years, though largely invisible, this movement is succeeding in a range of reforms for inclusion and accountability, from reducing the power of money in politics and automatic voter registration to ensuring fair and representational redistricting.<\/p>\n

It is perhaps the first movement of its kind in our nation\u2019s history, and chronicling its rise forms the heart of our new book \u201cDaring Democracy.\u201d<\/p>\n

So, in this perilous moment, let us pause to register some good news. The three conditions humans need to accomplish what might seem impossible are met. Democracy is essential. It is possible. And achieving it is a daring and noble calling in which a rising Democracy Movement enables each of us to enlarge our lives with power, meaning, and connection.<\/p>\n

In other words, we have what it takes to make history.<\/p>\n

Adapted from \u201cDaring Democracy: Igniting Power, Meaning, and Connection for the America We Want\u201d by Frances Moore Lapp\u00e9 and Adam Eichen (Beacon Press, 2017). Reprinted with permission from Beacon Press.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In fending off despair and effectively taking on democracy\u2019s degradation, one insight has helped us a lot: that it\u2019s not the magnitude of a challenge that crushes the human spirit; rather, it\u2019s a sense of futility that does us in.\u00a0Homo sapiens\u00a0evolved, after all, as doers and problem solvers.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":128238,"featured_media":3470525,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[213522,213526,79720],"tags":[116235,96527],"class_list":["post-3470517","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-inspiration","category-act-inspiration-featured","category-society","tag-buildingresilientcommunities","tag-democracy"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3470517","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/128238"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3470517"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3470517\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3470525"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3470517"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3470517"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3470517"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}