{"id":1218328,"date":"2004-10-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-10-19T23:00:00","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2020-12-15T22:10:45","modified_gmt":"2020-12-15T22:10:45","slug":"lng-boom-needs-terminal-sites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/stories\/2004-10-20\/lng-boom-needs-terminal-sites\/","title":{"rendered":"LNG boom needs terminal sites"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>PASCAGOULA &#8211; In a rush to take advantage of high gas prices and low importing costs for liquefied natural gas, U.S. energy companies have been working to open LNG facilities on the nation&#8217;s East, West and Gulf coasts.<\/p>\n<p>But public concerns in California, Maine and Alabama over the explosive nature of the super-cooled hydrocarbon inspired some companies to start applying for terminals based offshore and away from population centers.<\/p>\n<p>Two offshore terminals south of Louisiana and one onshore in Hackberry, La., already have been approved by the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, respectively.<\/p>\n<p>Last month the U.S. Coast Guard put all offshore applications on hold pending an investigation into environmental concerns about the impact offshore terminals could pose to the nation&#8217;s fisheries.<\/p>\n<p>Now, at least in Mississippi, LNG interest is creeping back onto land.<\/p>\n<p>And despite the fact Gulf LNG Energy LLC&#8217;s facility would be in Pascagoula&#8217;s industrial center, near Chevron&#8217;s refinery complex, company officials say there&#8217;s nothing to fear.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s a lot of stuff written about (the risk). The people that are opposed to these projects put out a lot of misinformation,&#8221; said Texas resident Dee S. Osborne, president of the private investor&#8217;s group that is Gulf LNG. There is &#8220;no way&#8221; the tankers could explode, he said.<\/p>\n<p>But recent federal studies found that such explosions could happen, possibly triggering a firestorm more than a half-mile wide and resulting in burn damage as far as a mile away.<\/p>\n<p>Osborne&#8217;s assessment of LNG safety also ran contrary to the position of some experts in the security field.<\/p>\n<p>In a phone interview Wednesday afternoon, Osborne said LNG facilities represent &#8220;low, low, low level terrorist targets.&#8221; Others, including the U.S. General Accounting Office, see it differently.<\/p>\n<p>Cyril Widdershoven, editor of Global Energy Security Analysis, called the tankers &#8220;especially attractive targets&#8221; to terrorists.<\/p>\n<p>Until Gulf LNG&#8217;s proposal for Pascagoula was announced Wednesday, the closest option being explored involved a ConocoPhillips Corp. effort to gain approval for a facility 11 miles south of Dauphin Island in Alabama. That project is now stalled, along with more than six proposed offshore facilities around the country awaiting a verdict on the technology&#8217;s environmental safety.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a rush to take advantage of high gas prices and low importing costs for liquefied natural gas, U.S. energy companies have been working to open LNG facilities on the nation&#8217;s East, West and Gulf coasts.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":3484440,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"template-images-removed.php","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[79716],"tags":[85832,85809,85815],"class_list":["post-1218328","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-energy","tag-energyinfrastructure","tag-fossilfuels","tag-naturalgas"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218328","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1218328"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1218328\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3484440"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1218328"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1218328"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.resilience.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1218328"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}